Why do Students in Australia Enrol in Criminology Degrees?
Abstract
Students choose to study criminology for various intrinsic and extrinsic reasons. This article explores whether any distinct groupings can be discerned in relation to underlying motivational profiles. Drawing on a survey of 430 Australian undergraduate criminology and criminal justice students, we utilise latent class analysis to identify distinct motivational profiles underlying respondent decisions to study criminology. Five motivational profiles were revealed – Curious, Activist, Lived Experience Altruist, Lived Experience Reformer, and Unclear. Empathic motivations were key in shaping study choices within all of the profiles except the fifth. However, the first four profiles differed in their emphasis: Curious and Lived Experience Altruist place greater weight on helping individual victims of crime, whereas for Activist and Lived Experience Reformer structural reform drives their educational decisions. A multinomial logistic regression demonstrated that class classification was influenced by respondents’ political ideology, attitudes towards the criminal legal system, punitiveness, and individualising moral foundations. These findings can help to address the educational challenges associated with student cohorts that have diverse enrolment motivations, and inform ongoing curriculum development. Further research can track the temporal evolution of motivational profiles to explore when and how they vary.
Except where otherwise noted, content in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.