The Four Ways of Eco-global Criminology

  • Rob White UTAS

Abstract

In charting out the ‘four ways’ of eco-global criminology, this paper discusses the importance of recognising and acting in regards to the differences evident in (1) ways of being (ontology), (2) ways of knowing (epistemology), (3) ways of doing (methodology) and (4) ways of valuing (axiology). The paper assumes and asserts that global study of environmental crime is essential to the green criminology project, and particularly an eco-global criminology approach. Specific instances of criminal and harmful activity therefore need to be analysed in the context of broad international social, political, economic and ecological processes. The article outlines the key ideas of eco-global criminology, a perspective that argues that global study must always be inclusive of voices from the periphery and margins of the world’s metropolitan centres, and critical of the social relations that sustain the epistemological as well as material realities and legacies of colonialism and imperialism. Yet, in doing so, there arise many paradoxes and conundrums that likewise warrant close attention.

Published
Mar 1, 2017
How to Cite
WHITE, Rob. The Four Ways of Eco-global Criminology. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 1, p. 8-22, mar. 2017. ISSN 2202-8005. Available at: <https://www.crimejusticejournal.com/article/view/375>. Date accessed: 29 mar. 2017. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.v6i1.375.

Keywords

Eco-global criminology; environmental harm; Indigenous experiences; elder knowledge; eco-justice.
Abstract Views:
0
PDF Views
73