The Revival of Comparative Criminology in a Globalised World: Local Variances and Indigenous Over‐representation

  • The University of Western Australia
     Australia

Abstract

In this article, I first examine the viability of comparative criminological research in a globalised world. Further, I test the validity of some global explanatory models against the local situation in countries that appear to resist the dominant trend, such as the Netherlands and Canada. I then zoom in even further to the intra-national differences in some federal nations, such as Canada and Australia, where this situation is often linked to the overrepresentation of Indigenous people and the consequences of colonialism. Finally, I discuss the future of comparative criminological research.

Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise noted, content in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Published: 2013-11-01
Pages:55 to 68
Section:Articles
Fetching Scopus statistics
Fetching Web of Science statistics
How to Cite
Tubex, H. (2013) “The Revival of Comparative Criminology in a Globalised World: Local Variances and Indigenous Over‐representation”, International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 2(3), pp. 55-68. doi: 10.5204/ijcjsd.v2i3.110.

Author Biography

The University of Western Australia
 Australia

Hilde Tubex is Associate Professor and Deputy Head of School, Research at the Law School of the University of Western Australia. Her areas of expertise are comparative criminology and penal policy, Indigenous peoples and the criminal justice system. She received an ARC Future Fellowship studying the difference in imprisonment rates within Australia, with a focus on Indigenous overrepresentation. She is currently working on a Criminology Research Grant to develop effective throughcare for Indigenous offenders.