Surplus Populations and the State: A Criminological View

Abstract

Surplus populations are back on the political agenda. With the rise of automation technologies and the advent of the hyperflexible ‘gig economy’, millions of individuals across the post-industrialised world will likely become supernumerary or consigned to low-quality jobs in the service sector. Neoliberalism signalled the abdication of the state’s responsibility for ensuring full employment and providing high-quality employment. However, criminology has largely forgotten the central roles played by both in preventing the spread of social pathologies. Against the logic of neoliberalism, what is needed is a state capable of counteracting the formation of surplus populations, or an anti-surplus state. A second New Deal would enact infrastructure investments and re-embed superfluous populations into meaningful employment relations. Following Bourdieu’s criticism of a scientistic ‘flight into purity’, criminologists should adopt the lessons learned by Sweden’s interwar social democrats and advocate policies capable of preventing the augmentation of social superfluity.

Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise noted, content in this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Published: 2019-02-18
Pages:131 to 146
Section:Articles
Fetching Scopus statistics
Fetching Web of Science statistics

Author Biography

Oslo Metropolitan University
 Norway

Dr. Victor L. Shammas is a Senior Researcher at the Work Research Institute (AFI), Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway. His research has appeared in journals like Punishment & Society, British Journal of Criminology, Constellations, Law & Critique, and Criminology & Criminal Justice. His work is available on his website: www.victorshammas.com.